3th Other Research Online!
“Specific Page Title or Article Title”
| "In Defense of Clean Energy" |
Primary Contributor to the Website
| |
Title of the Entire Website (not www. )
| The New York Times |
Publisher or Sponsoring Organization of the website (if given)
| The New York Times |
Date Page was Last Revised
| 27 January 2012 |
Date You Read It
| 3 February 2012 |
<URL address> (ALL of it)
|
FIVE FACTS FROM THE SOURCE (Embedded):
|
President Obama " has a history of making great speeches with frustratingly limited follow-through" because he was hard working and he was support to help environment to become health environment. |
President told the people that they would get a job because it is " powerful case to be makes that clean energy investments that will create real jobs and keep America competitive in a $5 trillion global market for advanced energy technologies. |
Republican try make convince to Congress to not support to President because it is "the failure of a single solar energy company, Solyndra, has a already raised doubts about the value and integrity of a multi billion- dollar federal programs designed to support renewable energy development." |
President still stood on his ground, pride and faith in his "vowed not to back down from rules aimed at preventing oil spills, rules protecting children from mercury poisoning, rules guaranteeing safe food and clean water. |
Republican get more frustrated with President Obama because he want "that a comprehensive strategy must include fossil fuels, and he pledged to promote natural gas and open up the outer continental shelf for oil exploration- both in an environment safe manner" which would be help environment to better. |
Summary of Source (Three-Four Sentences of the Who, What, Where, Why, and How in your own words. NO OPINION):
President Obama, was angry with Republican because they want the natural gas from sand in Canada but Obama say no! He wont sign for accept that paper with going plan what Republicans. Also he want to help people to get good health and get job in health way. Republican try convince to Congress resist to president's favor to help give him power, but it not work because President Obama still stand his ground against Republican.
Credibility of Source:
Author or Site: Who is the author? What training have they had? If there is no author, examine the site. What is the purpose of the site? Who funds the site?
The New York Times was fund this report, they was heard President Obama's speech to people against Republicans idea about pipeline, so site was get information.
Attachment: Does the author or site have anything to gain from writing this, or is it simply informative? For example, is it a cigarette business posting an article about the benefit of cigarettes, or is it a scientific community unaffiliated with the cigarette business?
article was just information, to people which President Obama want people to heard what his vowed about better environment, also he was strong vowed.
Bias: Do you detect a bias (a favoring of either side) in the author's writing?
References: Does the author cite references in the writing? If so, do these add or take away from the credibility?
Yes President Obama was strong faith in his vowed about clean energy which will make lot money for factory was making things under clean bill, he was try make congress to support President's idea.
Use of Source: How will you use this source in your project?
Yes i will use this because President Obama was working hard to make congress to support his ideas and allow his doing his way. and i want support President's ideas. this article support my idea about environment. some people try doing better environment.
No comments:
Post a Comment