5th Final Research Online!

 5th Final Research Online!

“Specific Page Title or Article Title”	"In the Land of Denial"
Primary Contributor to the Website (if given)	N/A
Title of the Entire Website (not www. )	The New York Times
Publisher or Sponsoring Organization of the website (if given)	The New York Times
Date Page was Last Revised	6 September 2011
Date You Read It	13 February 2012
<URL address> (ALL of it)	http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/07/opinion/in-the-land-of-denial-on-climate-change.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=global%20warming%20hoax&st=cse

FIVE FACTS FROM THE SOURCE (Embedded):

Rick Perry was not believe in the global warming, and he was say " climate change is an unproven theory created by a substantial number of scientists who have manipulated data so that they will have dollars rolling into their projects"

So after rumor spread about global warming is hoax then most of Republican presidental field "also reject the scientific consenus"

But Two other part of people was believe in global warming was Jon Huntsman Jr. was "believe in evolution and trust scientists on global warming. Call me Crazy." He was fully support to the scientists's work.

Ron Paul of Texas, was not believe in the global warming and he believe that scientist was fake on global warming because he say "the greatest hoax i think that has been around for many, many years."

Other people say Global warming is hoax because it is just natural, and it not make from human active, One women name Michele Bachmann of Minnesota say that "carbon dioxide was nothing to fear because it is a natural byproduct of nature and has complained of manufactured science."

Summary of Source (Three-Four Sentences of the Who, What, Where, Why, and How in your own words. NO OPINION):


Rick Perry was not believe in the global warming, he believe that the global warming was fake all time, and he was said that global warming hoax. He Figure there has some company was not existed or making. He believe that scientific was warning everyone for what? to gain their money.
Credibility of Source:
Author or Site: Who is the author? What training have they had? If there is no author, examine the site. What is the purpose of the site? Who funds the site?

The New York times was website, they was just get information from free lancer, which they was gather information. Their purpose to gather information, and they spread article to everyone who want know what going on with potilic's mind.


Attachment: Does the author or site have anything to gain from writing this, or is it simply informative? For example, is it a cigarette business posting an article about the benefit of cigarettes, or is it a scientific community unaffiliated with the cigarette business?


Author's article was just information, and gather information from Rick Perry.


Bias: Do you detect a bias (a favoring of either side) in the author's writing?

References: Does the author cite references in the writing? If so, do these add or take away from the credibility?


neutal. they was just neutral.


Use of Source: How will you use this source in your project?


Yes I will use this for my opposite view from my topic, because there has some group or person was politc was not believe about global warming or air pollution.