2nd Other Research Online!
“Specific Page Title or Article Title”
|
"Wind Turbines and Health Hazards"
|
Primary Contributor to the Website (if given) (author, editor, producer, etc)
| Leslie Kaufman |
Title of the Entire Website (not www. )
| "The New York Times Green" |
Publisher or Sponsoring Organization of the website (if given)
| The New York Times |
Date Page was Last Revised
| 18 January 2012 |
Date You Read It
|
3 February 2012
|
<URL address> (ALL of it)
|
FIVE FACTS FROM THE SOURCE (Embedded):
|
People try make federal believe that they has " problems like disturbances in the vestibular system that affect the inner ear and balance" because they want wind turbines to stop. |
scientific start investigation to make sure that wind turbines did not "beyond the range of human hearing range cannot affect the human balance system." |
People continue complain about sound, it affect them lost their balance, "weight of the evidence suggest no association between noise from wind turbines and psychological distress or other mental health problem." |
Kenneth L. Kimmell, the commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Environment Protection, say that people complain because they are "on issue of whether the noise causes annoyance or sleep disruption." |
The scientific find out other things about wind turbines because it was "that wind turbine sound is more noticeable, annoying and disturbing than other community or industrial sounds at the same level of loudness," which happen at every night. |
Summary of Source (Three-Four Sentences of the Who, What, Where, Why, and How in your own words. NO OPINION):
Kenneth L. Kimmell, the commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Environment Protection, was discussing about people become complain because the wind turbines was more annoying while every night, also it help company to get clean bill from wind turbines. So federal wont foreclose the wind turbines over complain in Massachusetts.
Credibility of Source:
Author or Site: Who is the author? What training have they had? If there is no author, examine the site. What is the purpose of the site? Who funds the site?
Attachment: Does the author or site have anything to gain from writing this, or is it simply informative? For example, is it a cigarette business posting an article about the benefit of cigarettes, or is it a scientific community unaffiliated with the cigarette business?
No, just gather information with her question from scientific opinion. gather information from federal.
Bias: Do you detect a bias (a favoring of either side) in the author's writing?
No author is neutral about side, she just get information also ask question.
References: Does the author cite references in the writing? If so, do these add or take away from the credibility?
No it is just normal report for everyone to know what is going on.
Use of Source: How will you use this source in your project?
Yes, I will use this source because Kenneth was gain clean bill and get good benefits for it. Also that are congratulation to them because they still run of business with wind turbines which keep the city to run energy. And they use the natural wind to work.
No comments:
Post a Comment