Thursday, February 16, 2012

4th Final Research Online!

4th Final Research Online!

“Specific Page Title or Article Title”


"Crisis Underscores Fears About Safety of Nuclear Energy"
Primary Contributor to the Website (author)


Norimitsu Onishi, Henry Fountain and Tom Zeller Jr.
Title of the Entire Website


The New York Times
Publisher or Sponsoring Organization of the website (if given)


The New York Times
Date Page was Last Revised


12 March 2011
Date You Read It


9 February 2012
<URL address> (ALL of it)




FIVE FACTS FROM THE SOURCE (Embedded):

In Japan, Something happen which everyone not expect that happen "two reactors at an earthquake-damaged nuclear plant could be suffering meltdowns underscores the Japanese nuclear industry's trouble history. 

Japan officals was concern about reactor but they decide to focus on safety of people but "accidents suggested that too little attention was paid to the threat of tsunami" that which was cause worse.

Japan offical was realize that they was make mistaken about earthquake with tsunami attack on the city which was "reactors withstood the powerful earthquake, but the ocean waves damaged generators and backup systemss, harming the ability to cool the reactors" 

Japanese scienific was concern about reactor would be damaged more, then they check it out, notice nothing but "not until sunday that the increasingly dangerous nature of the problems at Daiichi became clear.

The reactor name "Reactor No. 1 there having suffered a radiation leak and an explosion," which would make the ground to shake.




Summary of Source (Three-Four Sentences of the Who, What, Where, Why, and How in your own words. NO OPINION):

In Japan, Daini, the Reactor of nuclear plant was explosion in Japan from equakearth, then tsunami wave charge against the factory then damage the machine which cooler the Fukushima Daiichi plant down. Then later everything get worse, because everything was focused on damage on city, and not realize that reactor was leak of nuclear.


Credibility of Source:
Author or Site: Who is the author? What training have they had? If there is no author, examine the site. What is the purpose of the site? Who funds the site?

Three author is Norimitsu Onishi, Henry Fountain, and Tom Zeller Jr.


Attachment: Does the author or site have anything to gain from writing this, or is it simply informative? For example, is it a cigarette business posting an article about the benefit of cigarettes, or is it a scientific community unaffiliated with the cigarette business?


Author just gather information about nuclear plant was spill over the Daiichi factory in Fukushima which that would get everyone else outside of Japan. Also that could harm all people's life from chemical smell.Bias: Do you detect a bias (a favoring of either side) in the author's writing?

Author's writing was in neutral, and they was just warn everyone about nuclear plant.

References: Does the author cite references in the writing? If so, do these add or take away from the credibility?

 

Use of Source: How will you use this source in your project?


Yes I will use this for history of event, this article was which cause to air or environment to become horrific because it could kill many people, but it have very chemical.

No comments:

Post a Comment